Does Social Media Cheapen the Bible?

We should be concerned about how our sinful hearts may seize Scripture in one hand and the social internet in the other.

In Amusing Ourselves to Death Neil Postman wrestles with the televangelism phenomenon that was sweeping the United States in the 1980s. The entire premise of Amusing is that different media may not be appropriate for certain messages. Much of Postman’s concern is with the ways in which television was trivializing everything from news to politics, and how “entertainment” became more important than truth.

Postman writes in his chapter entitled “Shuffle off to Bethlehem” (bolding mine):

on television, religion, like everything else, is presented, quite simply and without apology, as entertainment. Everything that makes religion an historic, profound and sacred human activity is stripped away; there is no ritual, no dogma, no tradition, no theology, and above all, no sense of spiritual transcendence. On these shows, the preacher is tops. God comes out as second banana.


Most Americans, including preachers, have difficulty accepting the truth, if they think about it at all, that not all forms of discourse can be converted from one medium to another. It is naïve to suppose that something that has been expressed in one form can be expressed in another without significantly changing its meaning, texture, or value.


The executive director of the National Religious Broadcasters Association sums up what he calls the unwritten law of all television preachers: “You can get your share of the audience only by offering people something they want.”

You will note, I am sure, that this is an unusual religious credo. There is no great religious leader—from the Buddha to Moses to Jesus to Mohammed to Luther—who offered people what they want. Only what they need. But television is not well suited to offering people what they need. It is “user friendly.” It is too easy to turn off. It is at its most alluring when it speaks the language of dynamic visual imagery. It does not accommodate complex language or stringent demands. As a consequence, what is preached on television is not anything like the Sermon on the Mount. Religious programs are filled with good cheer. They celebrate affluence. Their featured players become celebrities. Though their messages are trivial, the shows have high ratings, or rather, because their messages are trivial, the shows have high ratings.

I believe I am not mistaken in saying that Christianity is a demanding and serious religion. When it delivered as easy and amusing, it is another kind of religion altogether.

Postman was not a Christian, but Christians would be wise to heed his counsel here. What he says about preachers on TV should lead us to ask about how we steward the gospel and God’s Word on the internet. Do we make God second banana?

I will write more on these quotes in the future, as I think they deserve a lot more attention and consideration than I will give here. But let’s think broadly and briefly about God’s Word, social media, and how they relate.

The Bible and Social Media: Some Thoughts

When we consider the relationship between the Bible and social media, we would do well to consider media theorist Marshall McLuhan’s famous words “The medium is the message,” meaning, “How you communicate something dramatically shapes what you’re communicating.” 

Given that I have spent my career creating biblical, Christian content for the web—of the short form variety on social media and the long form variety on YouTube and blogs—I have often grappled with how Scripture and the social internet relate. The obvious, upfront concern is that the social internet has made communication cheap, fleeting, and driven by that which is most entertaining not that which is most valuable. Unfortunately, the conundrum in which we find ourselves is one where “entertainment value” is the full measure of a piece of content’s value or a content creator’s value!

So, given this harsh reality, should we subject the holy Word of God to such potential threat of trivialization and ill-repute because it cannot measure up to modern standard of internetainment? Worse yet, how do we share Scripture on the internet without letting it simply become another form of entertainment?

I have come to the conclusion that Christians would be poor stewards of God’s Word if we don’t share it with others through this medium, but we would be wise to do so with care and with special attention given to the temptation we will face to use God’s Word as a means of personal gain. We should share the wisdom and truth of the Bible on the internet—how could we not?!—but we should not use it as a prop in the ongoing production in which we are all either actors or patrons. 

Obviously, like so many things, whether we share the Scripture in sincerity or in selfishness is a matter of the heart which can be difficult to discern in a vacuum—this is why personal accountability is so important. Imagine you see a friend sharing a beautiful sunset image with John 3:16 superimposed over the top of it. Could this friend be sharing the image to sinfully practice his or her righteousness before men in order to build his or her reputation? Of course. Could this friend also simply be sharing encouragement in hopes of pointing people to Christ with no self-serving intent? This is also possible.

Ultimately, I think that we shouldn’t be afraid of how social media may cheapen Scripture—the power of God in the Word of God cannot be thwarted by the medium itself. However, we should be concerned about how our sinful hearts may seize Scripture in one hand and the social internet in the other toward a sinful effort to make much of ourselves. This is a temptation that will always lurk in the shadows as long as we lust for attention and influence, which are the twin currencies of our digital world.

More thoughts on this soon, to be sure, as we have only scratched the surface of that great clip from Postman. But I came across this chapter the other day and wanted to sketch out some of my thinking.